93 research outputs found

    Experimental Investigations on Dopamine Transmission Can Provide Clues on the Mechanism of the Therapeutic Effect of Amphetamine and Methylphenidate in ADHD

    Get PDF
    The aim of this review is to compare the experimental evidence obtained from in vitro studies on the effect of amphetamine and methylphenidate on dopamine transmission with the results obtained in animal models of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This comparison can extend the knowledge on the mechanism of action of the drugs used in the therapy of ADHD and provide insight into the etiology of ADHD. In particular, we considered the results obtained from in vitro methods, such as synaptosomes, cells in culture, and slices and from in vivo animal models of ADHD, such as spontaneous hypertensive rats (SHR) and the Naples high-excitability (NHE) rat lines. The different experimental approaches produce consonant results and suggest that in SHR rats, in contrast to Wistar Kyoto rats (WKY), amphetamine and depolarization by high K+ might release different pools of dopamine-containing vesicles. The pool depleted by amphetamine might represent dopamine that is stored in large dense core vesicles, whereas dopamine released by high K+ might be contained in small synaptic vesicles (SSV). The sustained dopamine transmission observed in the nucleus accumbens of SHR but not WKY rats can be supported by an elevated synthesis and release, which also might explain the stronger effect of methylphenidate on dopamine release in SHR but not in WKY rats. This hypothesis might enlighten the common therapeutic effect of these drugs, although their action takes place at different levels in catecholaminergic transmission

    Role of Prefrontal Cortex Dopamine and Noradrenaline Circuitry in Addiction

    Get PDF
    Understanding the mechanisms of drug dependence has been the goal of a large number of neuroscientists, pharmacologists and clinicians who carried out research with the hope of individuating and proposing an efficacious therapy for this disorder (Sofuoglu, 2010; Kalivas and Volkow, 2011). Unfortunately, although huge efforts, drug dependence is still a relevant health, social and economical problem (Popova et al., 2012; Hiscock et al., 2011; Shorter and Kosten, 2011). Treatments for drug abuse are for the most part ineffective because the molecular and cellular mechanisms through which drugs of abuse alter neuronal circuitry are still unexplained and above all, because drugs of abuse determine a global alteration of cerebral functions that govern behaviour through decision formation, making therefore unfocused the identification of a pharmacological target (Volkow et al., 2011; Schultz 2011). One of the first strategies pursued in drug dependence therapy was directed to removal of pleasure associated with drug taking, but the compliance with the treatment has been always limited, although it could improve when it was supported by psychology based motivational therapy as in alcohol dependence (Krampe and Ehrenreich, 2010; Simkin and Grenoble, 2010). On the other hand it is not infrequent that heavy smokers or heavy drinkers stop suddenly dependence just because their will overcome year-long habits. Decision making is a process based on the interaction between prefrontal cortex (PFC) and subcortical regions involved in reward and motivation, therefore it is likely that failure in self-regulatory behavior, that is common in addicted subjects, could be dependent upon the alteration of interactions between the prefrontal cortex and subcortical regions (Heatherton and Wagner, 2011). In this chapter we will review the role of PFC in addiction with particular attention to dopamine and norepinephrine transmission

    Prepuberal stimulation of 5-HT7-R by LP-211 in a rat model of hyper-activity and attention-deficit: permanent effects on attention, brain amino acids and synaptic markers in the fronto-striatal interface

    Get PDF
    The cross-talk at the prefronto-striatal interface involves excitatory amino acids, different receptors, transducers and modulators. We investigated long-term effects of a prepuberal, subchronic 5-HT7-R agonist (LP-211) on adult behaviour, amino acids and synaptic markers in a model for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Naples High Excitability rats (NHE) and their Random Bred controls (NRB) were daily treated with LP-211 in the 5th and 6th postnatal week. One month after treatment, these rats were tested for indices of activity, non selective (NSA), selective spatial attention (SSA) and emotionality. The quantity of L-Glutamate (L-Glu), L-Aspartate (L-Asp) and L-Leucine (L-Leu), dopamine transporter (DAT), NMDAR1 subunit and CAMKIIα, were assessed in prefrontal cortex (PFC), dorsal (DS) and ventral striatum (VS), for their role in synaptic transmission, neural plasticity and information processing. Prepuberal LP-211 (at lower dose) reduced horizontal activity and (at higher dose) increased SSA, only for NHE but not in NRB rats. Prepuberal LP-211 increased, in NHE rats, L-Glu in the PFC and L-Asp in the VS (at 0.250 mg/kg dose), whereas (at 0.125 mg/kg dose) it decreased L-Glu and L-Asp in the DS. The L-Glu was decreased, at 0.125 mg/kg, only in the VS of NRB rats. The DAT levels were decreased with the 0.125 mg/kg dose (in the PFC), and increased with the 0.250 mg/kg dose (in the VS), significantly for NHE rats. The basal NMDAR1 level was higher in the PFC of NHE than NRB rats; LP-211 treatment (at 0.125 mg/kg dose) decreased NMDAR1 in the VS of NRB rats. This study represents a starting point about the impact of developmental 5-HT7-R activation on neuro-physiology of attentive processes, executive functions and their neural substrates

    THE INTERRELATIONSHIP OF DOPAMINE AND NORADRENALINE IN THE PREFRONTAL CORTEX : FROM PHYSIOOLGY TO THERAPY

    No full text
    Dopamine release and noradrenaline release in the prefrontal cortex are required for the control of neurobiological functions, whose alteration is considered to be critical in the aetiology of widespread diseases such as schizophrenia, depression and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The therapeutic agents used in treating these diseases may either increase or reduce dopamine and noradrenaline transmission by acting at receptor or at reuptake site level. The capacity of noradrenaline terminals to capture dopamine by means of the noradrenaline transporter (NET) has opened up new perspectives on the mechanism of action of norepinephine reuptake blockers such as long-established antidepressants or the new therapeutic agent for ADHD, atomoxetine. On the other hand, the hypothesis that dopamine and noradrenaline may be co-released from noradrenaline terminals in the prefrontal cortex suggests an additional interpretation of experimental evidence on the regulation of both dopamine and noradrenaline release through the pre-synaptic 2 receptor. Moreover, the high affinity of noradrenaline for the dopamine D4 receptor and its role in the prefrontal cortex, as well as the capacity of atypical antipsychotics to increase both noradrenaline and dopamine release in this area of the brain, support the hypothesis that dopamine-noradrenaline interaction may have a crucial role in the aetiology and in the therapy of schizophrenia. This chapter will illustrate and discuss the evidence for and against the hypothesis that there is an interdependence between dopamine and noradrenaline transmission in the prefrontal cortex, taking into consideration some recent evidence from our laboratory on the effect of chronic treatment with methylphenidate and atomoxetine on dopamine and noradrenaline release in the prefrontal cortex. Available Options: Version: Download: Windows - Englis

    Dopamine reuptake by norepinephrine neurons: exception or rule?

    No full text
    Crit Rev Neurobiol. 2004;16(1-2):121-8. Dopamine reuptake by norepinephrine neurons: exception or rule? Carboni E, Silvagni A. Department of Toxicology and Centre of Excellence on Neurobiology of Addiction, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy. [email protected] Dopamine reuptake by norepinephrine terminals can occur in brain areas such as the prefrontal cortex, the nucleus accumbens shell, and the bed nucleus of stria terminalis that are innervated, although unevenly, by both dopamine and norepinephrine neurons. Therefore the antidepressants that bind selectively the norepinephrine transporter might produce their therapeutic effect by raising the extracellular concentration of dopamine besides that of norepinephrine. Moreover, cocaine can be reinforcing even in knock-out mice for the dopamine transporter because it might raise synaptic dopamine in the nucleus accumbens shell by preventing its uptake by the norepinephrine transporter, an effect that could take place even in wild animals. Recently, it has also been suggested that dopamine can be co-released with norepinephrine by norepinephrine neurons, although it is not clear whether this feature might be related to a previous nonspecific uptake of dopamine by the norepinephrine transporter. In this review we discuss the potential role of the nonspecific uptake of dopamine by norepinephrine transporter in the mechanism of action of drugs of abuse, antipsychotics, and antidepressants. PMID: 15581407 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE

    Dopamine Reuptake by Norepinephrine Neurons: Exception or Rule?

    No full text
    corecore